05.12.2025
Reading time: 5 min

Streeting Initiates Review of Mental Health and ADHD Diagnoses

Streeting orders review into mental health and ADHD diagnoses

Health Secretary Wes Streeting has announced the commencement of an independent investigation into the increasing demand for mental health, ADHD, and autism services across England. This review will assess whether there is evidence indicating over-diagnosis, as well as identify existing gaps in available support.

The government has stated its commitment to enhancing service offerings, yet many regions continue to experience extensive waits for therapeutic interventions. Data from the NHS reveals a notable rise in mental health issues and ADHD cases over the last twenty years, prompting concerns that some individuals are being placed on waiting lists unnecessarily.

Earlier this year, Streeting expressed to Laura Kuenssberg that mental health disorders were being over-diagnosed and that an excessive number of individuals were being dismissed. However, in a recent article for a prominent publication, he acknowledged that his previous comments did not adequately reflect the complexity of the issue and described them as a regrettable miscommunication.

He emphasized the importance of properly addressing this matter, declaring, “This issue is too significant to remain unresolved and demands a solid evidence foundation.” While announcing the review, he stated, “We must approach this from a strictly clinical perspective to gain an evidence-based insight… This is essential to ensure everyone receives prompt access to precise diagnoses and effective assistance.”

This initiative occurs amid government efforts to manage a rising welfare expenditure, although the Department of Health and Social Care has clarified that the review operates independently. Some welfare benefits require individuals to demonstrate how a health condition impacts their work capacity, although a formal diagnosis is not mandatory for many cases.

Earlier this year, the government faced backlash from over 100 Labour backbenchers regarding proposed cuts to disability benefits, particularly those affecting individuals with mental health challenges. On Monday, the Prime Minister pledged to renew efforts to reform the welfare system, which he claimed has “trapped individuals in poverty” and unfairly categorized “young people as too ill to work.”

The new review, spearheaded by clinical psychologist Professor Peter Fonagy, is set to release its findings by summer. Professor Fonagy noted the review’s goal is to “rigorously test assumptions and actively listen to those most impacted, ensuring our recommendations are both sincere and genuinely beneficial.”

Statistics from the NHS indicate that the proportion of adults aged 16 to 64 reporting mental health issues surged to 22.6% in 2023-24, a significant increase from 17.6% in 2007. This trend is particularly pronounced among younger populations and the unemployed.

Furthermore, 14% of adults now report symptoms consistent with ADHD, a jump from 8% in 2007, although experts estimate that only about 5% exhibit clinically significant levels of the disorder. As of March, around four million working-age adults in England and Wales were receiving either disability or incapacity benefits, up from nearly three million in 2019, as per research findings.

The DHSC acknowledged that the increased demand on the NHS has led to prolonged waiting times for those with urgent needs, resulting in many navigating stretched services, experiencing disparities in care, and feeling neglected when they require support the most.

Jenny Tan, a 23-year-old student from Surrey, shared her experience of being one of the worst cases of anorexia her hospital had encountered, after enduring a nearly two-year wait for her diagnosis. She humorously remarked on the idea of over-diagnosis, stating, “I fought so hard for a diagnosis; it took years.”

The review aims to evaluate the functioning of NHS services and explore what support systems could be deployed earlier in the process. Government officials are keen to establish a baseline for diagnoses and define what constitutes quality care.

It is believed that one contributing factor to the lengthy waiting periods is that individuals who do not necessarily require treatment are being referred to waiting lists, when practical assistance, such as help with social or financial challenges or a brief period of talking therapy, could suffice.

Investments are already being made to enhance support in educational settings and broaden access to talking therapies. Professor Sir Sam Everington, a London GP and president of the Royal College of GPs, remarked that his workload concerning mental health patients has risen significantly in recent years.

He noted, “There’s considerable pressure from social media for individuals to obtain a diagnosis. Consequently, we label many with anxiety or depression when much of this is simply the normal ups and downs of life.” He continued, “We often convey the message that we possess the solution to someone’s problem, suggesting there’s a magic pill that will resolve everything. However, the reality is more complex.”

The mental health charity Mind welcomed the government’s initiative and expressed a readiness to assist with the review. Dr. Sarah Hughes, the chief executive, stated, “This presents a significant opportunity to truly understand the factors driving the rising prevalence of mental illness, especially among young people.”

The National Autistic Society stressed the need for immediate action, indicating that while the number of individuals seeking assessments is stabilizing, the average wait time continues to escalate.

Comments

Leave a Comment